Posted by: arnegrim | December 17, 2010

Amelia Earhart… or a turtle?

“The remains turned up in May and June at what seemed to be an abandoned campsite near where native work crews found skeletal remains in 1940. The pieces appear to be from a cervical bone, a neck bone and a finger.

But Gillespie offered a word of caution: The fragments could be from a turtle.”

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/discoveries/2010-12-17-search-for-amelia-earhart_N.htm?csp=34news&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+usatoday-NewsTopStories+(News+-+Top+Stories)

HUH?!?  They can’t tell the difference between human bone fragments and turtle bone fragments?

This is exactly why the ‘evidence’ for evolution is so laughable… if you can’t tell the difference between a human and a turtle… how do you figure to do that with an ‘unknown species’?  The fragments they use for that are no bigger.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: